Fact Finding Investigations - Report
In Dean’s book, ‘Practical Methods for Legal Investigations: Concepts and Protocols in Civil and Criminal Cases’ – (www.PracticalMethodsForLegalInvestigations.com) the process of legal investigation, including conducting these types of investigations, is Prepare, Inquire, Analyze, Document, and Report.
 
In past months we shared some insight into each of the preceding steps of Dean’s developed professional investigative protocol – Prepare, Inquire, Analyze and document – at www.DeathCaseReview.com/afi-llc-blog. This month we will talk about the natural transition to Report.
 
The most important document the legal investigator, or expert, produces is their written report. Herein, ‘report’ refers to any written communication to the client. This report may be shared with clients, attorneys, insurances companies, judges, juries and even law enforcement. Just as the legal investigator reviews dozens of reports, so too will those same parties review the legal investigator’s report. It must not only be concise and factual, but also be free of errors that may diminish the perceptual quality of the report and work-product of the legal investigator. Reports may also include confidential memos. Prior to drafting any reports, it is important to determine from the client what is expected. This is particularly important to discovery and disclosure sensitive issues. It is also important to agree with the client on intervals of any reports.
 
In each report detail specific assignment progress and case status. This would include the status of any ongoing, suspended, or changed assignments. New findings, conflicting findings, mitigating and aggravating information are important to convey. Include the who, what, when, where, and how of each assignment and how they interconnect – from other parties to information, facts and evidence.
 
What does this Investigative Protocol do?
Legal Investigation, in both civil and criminal matters, is simply a progression from information and leads to the next assignment. It should flow naturally, and be flexible based upon the needs of the case, progress of the case, and developed information.
 
Legal investigators are fact finders, for better or for worse for the client. As such, legal investigators have a duty to the attorney-client to present a complete picture so that they may better assist the attorney in advocating for their client.

Fact Finding Investigations - Document
In Dean’s book, ‘Practical Methods for Legal Investigations: Concepts and Protocols in Civil and Criminal Cases’ – (www.PracticalMethodsForLegalInvestigations.com) the process of legal investigation, including conducting these types of investigations, is Prepare, Inquire, Analyze, Document, and Report.
 
In the last three months we shared some insight into the first three steps of Dean’s developed professional investigative protocol – Prepare, Inquire and Analyze – at www.DeathCaseReview.com/afi-llc-blog. This month we will talk about the natural transition to Document.
 
In the Document stage of this Investigative protocol it is time to review and document the factual information and evidence. There are three components to this: evidentiary discovery and disclosures, attorney-client and client, and the legal investigator’s work product.  There are three purposes to this documentation:  existing and excluded, cross referenced across components, and to maintain evidence protocols and procedures. the legal investigator should follow a protocol and methodology that includes record keeping and tracking - just as they do when reviewing of discovery and disclosures from opposing parties. In this we see the course of our own investigation, and the opposing investigation. This is primarily useful in criminal defense and looking into official investigations leading to charges and prosecution.  

This includes having evidence logs, photograph logs, diagram details, witness information, and time lines as needed. Keep continuous case progression information in a summary. As the case nears possible settlement, disposition, negotiations, or trial – the attorney will want a concise summary of the case reports. This will allow you to (almost) effortlessly present this information to the attorney.

This Document stage is not reporting or memorializing specifics of the case.  This Document stage is for the purpose of knowing what components are in the working case file.  Most of the tasks in this Document stage have been completed concurrently with the other stages:  Prepare, Inquire, and Analyze stages - as information comes in and is generated, it is logged with associated cross-references noted.  This Document stage is both a task and a check to ensure completion.  If it is not supported it cannot be reported; and, if it is not reported, it is not evidence.

Fact Finding Investigations - Analyze
In Dean’s book, ‘Practical Methods for Legal Investigations: Concepts and Protocols in Civil and Criminal Cases’ – (www.PracticalMethodsForLegalInvestigations.com) the process of legal investigation, including conducting these types of investigations, is Prepare, Inquire, Analyze, Document, and Report.
 
In the last two months we shared some insight into the first two steps of Dean’s developed professional investigative protocol – Prepare and Inquire – at www.DeathCaseReview.com/afi-llc-blog. This month we will talk about the natural transition to Analyze.
 
The Analyze stage of this Investigative protocol follows a series of important organizational planning steps.  It is where the rubber meets the road - the investigation and case gain traction.  The legal investigator has gathered information and determined the factual evidence versus the information provided only in the disclosure and discovery; and processes of law enforcement, government, and business or insurance investigators.  This Analyze stage is both a subjective and objective reasoning exercise completed within each assignment, then assignment to assignment or task to task – scene to scene and witness to witness, and so forth until the case is completed.  For this reason, it is important to organize the investigation into these individual assignments and stages. 
 
These stages are typically immediate, interim or intermediate, and long-term goals and needs.  This is primarily based upon factors outside of the legal investigator's control:  legal calendaring requirements, availability of records and reports, and the priority and availability of witnesses, and so forth.  As noted in the Prepare stage, prioritizing is an important part of the investigative preparation.  Key components to prioritize are:  evidence and discovery or disclosure analysis, incident investigation and documentation, and key witness interviews.  These are generally always the first and short-term priorities of the initial stages of the investigation.  After this is completed, in the Inquire stage, an analysis must be done.  The legal investigator will look at the totality of the evidence as an assessment.  First is the analysis of the provided records and reports.  Then will be the analysis of the Inquire information – your investigation to date.  Finally, will be the comparison of the two packets of information - ultimately determining what is factual, possible or plausible, and what is partially to wholly fiction.
 
The legal investigator has invested a significant amount of time, funds, and resources working the case just through the Prepare and Inquire stages.  This Analyze stage is not as fundamentally consuming of resources; it is however, equally important.  This is particularly true of the two areas of investigative findings to be analyzed:  provided information and information developed in this Investigative Protocol.  The analysis is not as time intensive as this Investigative Protocol and processes to date.  This is because the training, education, and experience of the legal investigator provide for this.  Legal investigators have two important skills:  to be inquisitive and analytical.  They work with and complement each other.  As with transitioning from Prepare to Inquire, the transition from Inquire to Analyze is natural for the seasoned legal investigator.  This transition may be during the Inquire stage, depending on the assignment, or it may be a completely separate function.  An analysis at the scene of a motor vehicle collision may be concurrent with that inquiry, and particularly before leaving; it may also be two-part, with further in-depth analysis usually done at a later time.
 
Analysis of each stage involves:  a complete comparison of the information; determination of any missing, conflicting, supporting, and damaging information; assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the information, facts, and evidence; additional assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the witnesses, parties of the case and other involved persons; assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the investigative process to date; and a complete assessment and analysis of the case progress to determine any new, continued, or different course of action to recommend and consider. 
 
This is also the time to determine if there is any follow-up to any assignments that were addressed during this assignment of the investigation.  In short, the legal investigator is providing a check and balance to ensure that no evidence is being forced upon a theory, or that no theory is being forced upon the evidence.  This is true of all information provided and developed in this Investigative Protocol, without regard for who is providing the evidence.  This process will continue throughout the assignment and the overall case, until the case is settled, dismissed, or other disposition reached.

Fact Finding Investigations – Inquire
Last month we shared some insight into the first step of Dean’s developed professional investigative protocol – Prepare – at www.DeathCaseReview.com/afi-llc-blog/fact-finding-investigations-prepare. This month we will talk about the step most jump to – Inquire. This is simply the investigative process, and may include witness interviews, detailed analysis of records, reports, and photographs, research, etc. It’s a smooth transition from Prepare and is focused on getting down to the facts of the case through full inquiry. This is the time to complete background records checks and investigations, contact victims and witnesses, and possible opportunities to expand your investigation.
 
All professional investigations – from law enforcement to private, and from surveillance to criminal investigations (defense or prosecution) – have core skill sets:
- Research
- Interviews
- Report writing
 
One common example is locating individuals – which requires all three. If you can conduct individual locates, you can conduct background investigations. If you can do both of those, you can do assets and liabilities investigations. These are not only important skill sets, they are fundamental skill sets – which give the ability to conduct basic and fundamental investigations.

In Dean’s book, ‘Practical Methods for Legal Investigations: Concepts and Protocols in Civil and Criminal Cases’ – (www.PracticalMethodsForLegalInvestigations.com) the process of legal investigation, including conducting these types of investigations, is Prepare, Inquire, Analyze, Document, and Report.
 
The investigative process is dynamic. It changes with new information from all the various sources and inquiries. Within your given parameters and priorities, follow the process…expand your investigation!  This is accomplished with canvassing the neighborhoods and businesses for witnesses, mapping and obtaining data for security/surveillance cameras, obtaining weather reports and warnings, road conditions, and history of incident area. These important steps will aid in confirming what is in the reviewed reports and what witnesses report. Check the unusual---quiet neighbor, urgent care clinics, food banks, homeless shelters, and delivery drivers.
 
Often the attorney-client will have limited knowledge and resources that are important to legal investigators. For this reason, it is important to make recommendations and requests for additional information (i.e. EMS logs, 911 calls) that may have been overlooked. This information may not be included in discovery, and may have details and other persons to contact, as well as may confirm or dispute other reports and statements. This is an important investigative step to find all of the case facts. Every report or memo submitted will likely provide an opportunity to make recommendations and requests for additional information. Not only is this beneficial to the case at hand, it also conveys integrity, experience and skills – professionalism – to the client.
 
The stumbling block for new investigators is what areas to focus on and offer their clients. This would depend on experience, preferences, and goals. Following this protocol will expand your skill sets and abilities. This Inquire Protocol is, of course, the key to a complete investigation in fact finding; it is not the only one – it is not the beginning or end.
 
Not only should a person seek to improve themselves and their investigative skills, they should seek to learn and improve on other skills and areas – adapt. In our 30 years as professional investigators, we have seen many things come and go – from how investigations can be conducted, to what is available due to changing laws and technology. What has never changed are the foundational skills to make full and complete investigations – Inquiry. These are Research, Interviews, and Report writing. Learn how to find people and find out about them. From witnesses to adverse parties – you will always need these skills, and will always be able to expand on them.

Fact Finding Investigations - Prepare
One of the most important and core tasks of investigators – from law enforcement to private, in civil and criminal litigation – is the witness interview. Witnesses can be victims or accusers, clients or defendants, those present at an event, and those not present who have information (hearsay). Generally, there are two sides to each witness – their own, and another’s; and the truth is the area between – which can lean more towards one person or another. It is the investigator’s duty – and skill – to assess the witness and fully inform their client (attorney, prosecutor, etc.) of the witness provided details. It is further important to empirically compare and contrast all details reported by witnesses, and also to other independent facts. Together these begin to tell the story, and determine the credibility of persons involved – including other investigators.

As noted in each of our books, the interview process is part of the fact gathering process – it is preceded by fact gathering, includes fact gathering, and is followed by more fact gathering. In Dean’s book, ‘Practical Methods for Legal Investigations: Concepts and Protocols in Civil and Criminal Cases’ – (www.PracticalMethodsForLegalInvestigations.com) the process of legal investigation, including each interview, is Prepare, Inquire, Analyze, Document, and Report.

The first step, in the full investigation and in each component and task – each witness, scene, event and empirically. Acquiring information, facts and evidence is a step-by-step building process, and we begin with the Prepare step.

As the old story goes, in the example of circumstantial evidence, is waking up to snowfall and seeing rabbit tracks in the snow. The conclusion seems obvious, it snowed overnight and a rabbit crossed in the snow. Both are reasonable conclusions of circumstantial evidence. It can be assured it snowed overnight, as there is no other explanation for snow on the ground in the morning. However, can it be concluded a rabbit crossed in snow – is there another explanation? Had you seen the rabbit cross in the snow, it would be conclusive. The same can be said for a physical altercation.

Two persons are on a public roadway, one is ahead on a motorcycle and another is passing in a vehicle. In changing lanes, returning to the ‘slow’ lane, the vehicle cuts off the motorcycle – as later reported by the motorcycle driver. The vehicle driver reported he did not. There are no other reported witnesses. In the course of the investigation, you obtain an independent statement from the vehicle driver’s insurance – who there is now a claim against (‘adverse driver’), which has been denied. The statement includes the vehicle driver reporting there were three additional persons, on motorcycles, who stopped and he was threatened – and left the scene of the accident out of fear for his life.

Law enforcement received a report from the motorcycle driver, and did contact the vehicle driver from a license plate reported. The motorcycle driver stated he was alone and did not threaten the vehicle driver. Law enforcement, several days after the event and having no other information, writes a citation to the vehicle driver for careless driving, but not for leaving the scene – the motorcycle driver is not cited. Your client is the attorney for the claimant, the motorcycle driver, and your task is to determine the facts which establish liability. Your task is NOT to only establish liability against the vehicle driver.

To ‘Prepare’ for your interview of the vehicle driver, you first obtain the Traffic Accident Report and statements, and also both the 911 calls and the dispatch log (i.e. Computer Aided Dispatch – CAD; or Calls For Service, etc.). From these you learn the following:
- The dispatch log shows the vehicle driver was the first caller from the scene.
- There were two other identified callers, also from the scene and the log includes information from each they witnessed an vehicle driving erratically in traffic and cut off a motorcycle. Neither stopped.
- The 911 call from the vehicle driver includes their statements of driving on the road, being surrounded by 3 or 4 loud motorcycles, and then being able to pass them. After he did, they sped up and surrounded him again, slowed down, and forced him to stop. After that, they were trying to open his car door and he was able to drive off, pulling into a gas station to call 911.
- The 911 call from the first witness states they saw a vehicle, described and matching the vehicle driver’s, pass them and then a car in front of them, and then a motorcycle. It looked like the vehicle pulled over fast because of another vehicle coming at them, cutting off the motorcycle.
- The 911 call from the second witness states they were behind a motorcycle, when a vehicle – which they could not describe, other than dark, passed them and the motorcycle, then cut off the motorcycle as another car passed from the opposite direction.
- There was no 911 call from the motorcycle driver.

Briefly, back to the 911 call of the vehicle driver and an important fact intentionally left out of the above information. During the 911 call, you hear the vehicle driver’s voice in a panic and you also hear loud banging and a male yelling he is going to pull him out of the car and beat him to death.

Also, back to the dispatch report and another piece of information – many now include GPS coordinates of the cell phone tower transmitting the call. Using any popular mapping software, you find the vehicle driver’s call came from closer to the reported scene of the traffic event, and not a gas station several miles away.
From your pre-interview preparation, you have learned the following:
- There were at least two unreported witnesses as 911 callers;
- Both reported the vehicle driver as driving in an unsafe manner;
- One reported seeing the vehicle driver cut off the motorcycle;
- Both reported seeing only one motorcycle;
- Neither reported seeing the vehicle or motorcycle stop;
- The first 911 call GPS, from the vehicle driver, was at a point several miles from where he reported calling from; and
- The first 911 call included background of a single person outside the vehicle making threats to the vehicle driver.

In many similar cases, there are now dashcams and personal cameras available at popular electronics stores. These are available to everyone, and can be mounted on bicycles, motorcycles, helmets, vehicles, etc. Cell phones are also used for photographs and videos. It is important to determine if any of these devices were used by any reporting persons, witnesses and law enforcement.

As investigators, our purpose is to find and report information, facts and evidence to our client. As legal investigators, this is to our attorney-client; as law enforcement this is to the prosecutor; and as insurance adjusters this is to the insurance company. Knowing we are investigating after-the-fact, it is important to keep in mind others also investigating may not have had all the information at the time of their investigation, and who they represent – insured, accuser, defendant, etc. – may have a cognitive bias, and perhaps only information supporting their claim is reported. Remember, our task is NOT to only establish liability against the opposing party.

Establishing a fact pattern is important to assuring your client is fully informed and can make appropriate decisions and legal strategy in the best interests of their client. This may include dropping any claims or charges, amending any claims or charges, or accepting a settlement or plea offer. The time to learn of what should have been investigated is NOT during any hearing, proceeding or trial – it is before.

Every investigation has its limitations – from time to resources to funding. The process of investigation, and the depth as well as direction, are dictated by these factors, as well as the directions of the client. As a legal investigator, we are tasked with finding all information, facts and evidence to present to our client, for them to make a full and informed decision in the best interests and protection of the rights of their client.

Autopsy Options in Civil and Criminal Litigation
 
We are often contacted for advice on having an autopsy performed, finding a forensic pathologist, or having our agency and/or forensic pathologist conduct a review of records, reports and photographs in a criminal or civil case for pre- and active litigation. Many find it interesting the options available to them – or not available. The first question to ask is – is the body available for autopsy; and the second is – was an autopsy performed? The only thing that prevents an autopsy is cremation. An autopsy can be performed on an embalmed body, including exhumed weeks to years - even decades - later.  Embalming does present issues; however, these are addressed by the forensic pathologist.
 
What are the available options for an autopsy? First, autopsy is from the Greek, ‘autopsia’ – “to see with one’s own eyes”. We recommend having a board certified forensic pathologist conduct any autopsy in potential litigation. Other specialties involve the hospital and medical setting – which involves clinical and anatomical pathology. A forensic pathologist, often cross trained and certified in both clinical and anatomical pathology, has the added education and training in areas of injury and injury causation to determine the cause and manner of death; such as our consulting forensic pathologist. In addition, we recommend a member of the National Association of Medical Examiners (www.theNAME.org). Areas of additional medical education and specialized training for the forensic pathologist includes toxicology, firearms and ballistics, blood analysis, and trace evidence, including DNA, collection.
 
The forensic autopsy includes a review of the medical history, crime scene evidence, evidence of injury or disease, and medical and trace evidence. A forensic pathologist is available to all parties – prosecution, plaintiff, and defense. In addition, a forensic pathologist is available for clinical consultation – examination of living persons – very important and valuable to surviving victims of serious bodily injury. The primary distinction between a fatal and non-fatal event can be fractions of an inch. We treat all SBI cases the same as death cases. Finally, we also recommend an expert medicolegal death investigator be present to document any autopsy requested.
 
An autopsy, to see with our own eyes, is available in the following manners:
- Private autopsy – if an autopsy has not been completed or the case is not in the jurisdiction of the medical examiner / coroner;
- Second full autopsy – if an autopsy, forensic or medical only, has been completed and an independent full forensic autopsy is needed. This includes exhumations;
- Forensic Pathology Review – if an autopsy has been completed, however, the body is not available for a second autopsy (cremated, not exhumed, logistically not available); and
- Forensic Body Documentation – whether previously autopsied or not, and the body is available, the body can be documented by photographs, video, diagramming, and any additional evidence collection.
 
There exists standards and protocols for when to conduct forensic autopsies, the process of both the forensic autopsy and the death investigation, as well as accepted usual practices for each. As part of our consultation in death cases, we review the processes of the official investigation.
 
Private Autopsy
If an autopsy has not been completed or the case is not in the jurisdiction of the medical examiner / coroner, the next-of-kin can request a private autopsy. As most deaths are not subject to autopsy, the family may have questions to be answered by autopsy. It is recommended that any unexpected death be autopsied; however, from budgets to forensic pathologist availability, most are not. As an example, we often see fatal motor vehicle collisions or law enforcement determined suicides not autopsied, as it is believed the cause and manner of death are known by investigation. We have written extensively on the errors of these ways.
 
A private autopsy is authorized and paid for by the next-of-kin, and conducted by an independent forensic pathologist. Consulting with a forensic pathologist in advance will assist in determining if a forensic autopsy is possible and potentially informative, or if another available option is better.
 
The private autopsy is conducted in the same manner as the medical examiner / coroner authorized autopsy. This includes gross external examination, and internal examination of the body, toxicology, and microscopic tissue examinations. The forensic pathologist will also request the decedent’s medical history, and circumstances of their death. We also recommend an expert medicolegal death investigator assist with the autopsy and investigative processes, much as a medical examiner / coroner system has available.
 
Second Full Autopsy
If an autopsy has been completed or the case is not in the jurisdiction of the medical examiner / coroner or private autopsy – and may include exhumation, the next-of-kin can request a private autopsy. A second autopsy is most common when there is a claim or dispute in the findings of the original autopsy. In media, we see this in potentially high-profile cases – such as law enforcement involved deaths. We may also see these where it is believe the first autopsy missed something, or did not conduct a specific test or examination, or where new evidence has been found and a second autopsy is necessary.
 
A second autopsy is also conducted as a Private Autopsy (above) and is also limited to the body being available, which would include embalmed and exhumed bodies. Being embalmed presents some issues, but does not hinder a second autopsy or findings. As with the original autopsy, the forensic pathologist will also request the decedent’s medical history, and circumstances of their death. In addition, they will dissect their own tissue for microscopic examination, and specimens for toxicology; they will also likely re-examine and test specimens from the original autopsy in microscopy and toxicology. In addition, we also recommend an expert medicolegal death investigator assist with the autopsy and investigative processes.
 
Forensic Pathology Review
If an autopsy has been completed, however, the body is not available for a second autopsy (cremated, not exhumed, logistically not available, or a forensic pathologist is unavailable) or there was no autopsy, there are alternatives, the first of which is an independent review by a forensic pathologist. This review would include the original autopsy report, toxicology results, medical history and circumstances of death as known at the time of the original autopsy.
 
Based on the findings of the review, or in consideration of the circumstances in litigation, the forensic pathologist may recommend also doing an independent examination of any retained specimens for microscopy and toxicology. This review, and additional independent examination, are as close to a second autopsy as can be done, without having the body to examine. Of course, any autopsy without a body is subject to the limitations of not being able to examine first-hand, as well as retain their own specimens. We also recommend an expert medicolegal death investigator assist with the review of the official investigative records, reports, and photographs with the forensic pathologist.
 
Forensic Body Documentation
As with the Forensic Pathology Review (above), the body can be documented by photographs, video, diagramming, and any additional evidence collection. A forensic pathologist may provide this service, or it is most often provided by an expert medicolegal death investigator. Due to the nature of the evidence, documentation, examination, and potential testimony, we recommend this be done with expert experience considered. There are specific steps and protocols to follow, as well as potential evidence to look for in the examination and documentation.
 
What Steps to Follow
Each of these available options – from autopsy to review – can be conducted at a morgue or funeral home setting, dependent on what is logistically available.  To further the findings of an unexpected death involved in litigation, time is of the essence and immediate action must be taken, to include:
- Obtain notarized consent from the next-of-kin or court order;
- Provide an immediate letter of preservation, or court order, to the medical examiner / coroner’s office and/or funeral home or other custodian of the body;
- Provide an immediate letter of preservation, or court order, to the medical examiner / coroner’s office, funeral home, hospital or other custodian of the tissue (histology) and toxicology specimens; and
- Make immediate arrangements with a board certified forensic pathologist and/or expert medicolegal death investigator.
 
Our goal is to provide you with the utmost in privacy, confidentiality and our professional attention to your legal investigation and expert consultation needs.​ ​You can learn about us at www.DeathCaseReview.com/Attorneys.html for details, CVs, and information packets.
 
​If we can be of assistance in any death or personal injury consultation or investigation, please contact our office at your convenience and visit www.DeathCaseReview.com/sample-cases.html for cases we have worked.  We welcome your inquiries and the opportunity to assist you.
​​​
A synopsis of our expert consultations is best described as: ​​
​​"Expert [Forensic / Medicolegal / Death] Investigator to review the records, reports, photographs and evidentiary documentation in order to provide a non-medical forensic expert opinion, within the scope of their education, training and experience, as to the totality of the circumstances of the fatal and non-fatal event and the competence of the official investigation, with respect to death investigation protocol and standards."
 
In addition, we have an affiliated consulting Forensic Pathologist and a Forensic Toxicologist available for additional, and medical specific, expert consultations – including all protocols and options presented here.
 
We invite you to contact us at your convenience for the opportunity, and to introduce you to the Associates in Forensic Investigations experience.

-----
Dean A. Beers, CLI, CCDI, CFI-FTER and Karen S. Beers, BSW, CCDI, CFI-FTER
Colorado Licensed Private Investigators (PI2.050 and PI2.019)
Cheyenne WY Licensed Private Investigators & Security (31146)
Board Certified Legal Investigator / Expert Consultant
Board Certified Criminal Defense Investigators
Board Certified Forensic Interviewer-Forensic Testimonial Evidence Recovery
Certified in Medicolegal Death Investigations / former Deputy Coroners

Associates in Forensic Investigations, LLC
A Rocky Mountain West Agency
Expert Consultants and Legal Investigators
Personal Injury, Negligence & Death in Civil, Criminal and Probate Litigation

www.DeathCaseReview.com ~ beersda@DeathCaseReview.com
CO - (970) 480-7793 Office / TXT and (970) 480-7794 Fax
WY - (307) 222-0136 Office / TXT and (307) 222-0138 Fax
'Quaero Indicium' - To Find The Evidence

I am humbled and honored to be chosen as the next Executive Director (ED) for the National Council of Investigation and Security Services (NCISS) organization.
 
Carol Ward has been the Executive Director for many, many years and it will be quite difficult to follow in her foot-steps.  Carol has been a fixture and an exemplary representative in her dedication to NCISS.
Carol is retiring and will be set free from the books to enjoy her life as she so deserves.
 
I want to thank Carol for her confidence and consideration in recommending me to fill the position as ED to NCISS.  I promise to do my best not to disappoint.
 
I also thank my husband, Dean Beers, for standing by my decision to pursue the ED position and always being there no matter what, even if sometimes he just stands there shaking his head at some of my antics.
 
I thank the special selection committee that was put to task in choosing an Executive Director as well as the Board who gave the thumbs up for me to have the opportunity to take the position.  I appreciate that all of you have given me the chance to assist NCISS in continuing the mission of this important association.  We will continue to advocate for all professional investigators and security officers and agencies.  Our main goal is to keep us all in business and we will continue keeping up with and being informed of any legislative actions that could impact our professions. 
 
Last, however, certainly not least, I want to thank all NCISS members.  Without all of you and your support, NCISS would not be able to continue on with our mission.  Like Carol, I am very approachable, and I invite you all to contact me with ideas and concerns to keep NCISS alive and well and working for our professions.
 
Remember: “You cannot speak up for yourself when you are six feet under, so do it while you still have a voice.”
by Karen Beers 

To all my colleagues and Many Friends,
 
As I start this new chapter in my life, the one thing I will miss, is the daily communication with so many of you.  Please know, retiring from NCISS was not an easy decision.  Knowing Karen Beers the way I do, I feel I have left you in very capable hands.  This makes it so much easier for me to step aside.  I don’t plan on being a stranger. Don’t be surprised if I show up at Hit the Hill next Spring. 
 
I am so very proud to have been a part of such a great association. I’m thankful to have been given the opportunity to work with so many professionals that have dedicated so much of their personal time and funds to make NCISS the very best national association for investigators and security professionals.
 
I sincerely appreciate NCISS’s support during my long tenure and will always consider myself a part of the NCISS family.  I wish all of my colleagues the very best, and am certain that the association will continue to grow and be successful. 
If I started listing all those that have helped me through this journey, it would take up the whole page.  So I will just say “Thank You” to all of you.  Please join me in welcoming Karen to her new position as Executive Director of NCISS.  You are lucky to have her.

In mid-June I announced to the NCISS membership the resignation of long-time NCISS Executive Director Carol Ward.  Carol has been steadfast in her long-time dedication to the Council, and deserves to finally enjoy a rich retirement.  Carol’s last day was July 31st. We are saddened that Carol is moving on, but excited about what the future holds for NCISS.
 
I appointed a Special Committee, Chaired by 1st VP Andrea Orozco, with Past Presidents Maria Landry, Ed McClain and James Huckabee - tasked with the duty of reviewing, interviewing and making a selection and recommendation for the position of Executive Director. The Special Committee completed its due diligence process, looking at resumes and conducting interviews to make its recommendation to the Board.
 
The Special Committee evaluated the candidates thoroughly; and based on experience and other factors Karen Beers was determined to the best choice to be appointed your new NCISS Executive Director. This was ratified by a vote of the Board and Karen’s position is effective 08/01/2018. Carol will help make the transition as smooth and transparent as possible for members. You will see announcements of new contact information, and updated to the NCISS website.
 
On behalf of NCISS members and Board, I want to thank Carol for her many years of excellent service!

Garbage In is Garbage Out
 
Just this week Dean was communicating with an old friend, Kelly Riddle, TCI (Kelmar Global – www.kelmarglobal.com in San Antonio TX) about database resources professional investigators use. At one time, it was not unusual for law enforcement to come to us for help with our resources – now they have some of the same access. This stared as a comment Kelly made to the Texas Association of Licensed Investigators listserv about what the best database is – a very common question, without one answer (even the providers will tell you). Kelly gave one of the best answers I’ve seen – based on his 29 years’ experience. In short, all information comes from the same sources – it is how it is searched (user) and returned (provider) that makes the difference. Because each case may have different inputs, and each provider has different data aggregating, algorithms, and reporting – the results may differ between providers. Within the providers, using the same input with different permissible purposes under the FCRA and GLBA, may produce different results. Sometimes inputting more information is better, sometimes less. There is an art to understanding all the nuances.
 
In our 30th year, our agency started with providing general individual locates, backgrounds and assets & liabilities records checks and investigations (there is a difference). While communicating with Kelly, he mentioned, “My first book “Private Investigating Made Easy” showed people how to do background searches before there was an internet…. good old gumshoe stuff!” How true! Dean’s first book, “Professional Investigations: Individual Locates, Backgrounds and Assets & Liabilities” (www.ProfessionalLocateInvestigations.com) offers the same history and necessity of this ‘gumshoe’ experience. This book was based on Dean’s first conference seminar, which became “Skip Trace Seminar on CD”. Early on, probably a decade before the book, Dean learned about these mysterious databases and asked a colleague. Needing to keep a secret, Dean was told, “I just entered the Social Security Number and had a new address.” – but he would not share the source. Being an investigator – without Google – Dean learned about sources and began to learn about them. He learned, Garbage In is Garbage Out.
 
Every professional investigator should know how data flows in and out with both public records and data providers. There is no magic wand, there are many mistakes, and all information must be verified before reporting. We often receive assignments from clients and colleagues requesting we conduct one of our general investigations. From time to time we are brought in after other attempts have been made and are unsuccessful.
 
Any record that is kept or provided is only as good as the chain of events involved.  Remember: Garbage In Is Garbage Out.
 
GIGO still remains an easy way for absconders to manipulate their credit report - not as easy now as it was. All they have to do is apply for credit with a different address (now they check ID - but many clerks do not look or will overlook if you tell them you just moved). This becomes a red herring. It is also important to know how to sort the information and rule out when someone uses certain search criteria to pull credit header data (PIs, collectors, etc.).
 
This unintentional manipulation used to happen more (algorithms with data companies screen this out better) and is when you use an old address to pull up current information. The address you used gets put at the top as being current - making the actual current address move down.
 
Everything is a record and creates the paper trail, or map, lending to the information about the subject.  How that record is maintained, stored and possibly disseminated, varies and influences the accuracy of the information.  Any record that is kept or provided is only as good as the chain of events involved.  At the beginning is the person that provides the information.  If the applicant lies or fails to provide accurate information, then the information subsequently received is consequentially inaccurate.  Persons are known to have fibbed just a little on a credit or job application. 
 
The next link is the person recording the information.  Any typos, misprints or other related mistakes also affect the record.  These mistakes are often seen on personal credit histories, even civil and criminal histories – ‘official’ records.  Following this would be the method of updating and record storage.  All records are only as accurate as the frequency of updates.  Some records are never updated.  Finally, what about the provider of the information?  Is the provider primary (the original record holder), secondary (bought the information from a primary record holder) or is the provider even more removed from the original record holder, such as an information provider (Consumer Reporting Agency)?  Did they have accurate retrieval information and were they knowledgeable in how to obtain and verify the information?
 
Anybody can find information and present it, but is it reliable?  Any error in this chain of record keeping will impact the ability to search the records, as well as the accuracy of the record and ultimately the investigation and findings.  After the information is received, it is usually a simple and inexpensive task to verify any relevant information through a primary source or provider of primary source information.
 
Although suitable for searching and conducting only records checks, database and online records are not detailed or suitable as the end-result for a comprehensive background investigation.  This is only summary information and detailed information is necessary.  There is no harm, and actually a great benefit to summary records, but always proceed to detailed records if available.  Current information will usually lead to finding historical information. 
 
All individual investigations require the verification of the accuracy of the information provided and developed through our Investigative Protocol – Prepare (gather the preliminary known subject data), Inquire (conduct the background investigation), Analyze (review the known and obtained subject information and records), Document (ensure all official documents are obtained) and Report (compile the investigative report and supporting documentation).  If at any stage of the Investigative Protocol there is any question, doubt, or concern – start over and do so before submitting any report that may contain factual or procedural errors or is otherwise incomplete.
 
No single record or repository, or single method of searching, should be relied upon.
 
This manner of investigation is not limited to general investigations. It is also important to Criminal Defense Investigations, as taught by another friend and colleague of nearly three decades – Brandon Perron, CCDI, CFI-FTER (Criminal Defense Investigation Training Council – www.DefenseInvestigator.com in Stuart FL). Stay tuned next month, as this topic is continued into defense investigations.
 
* Dean started our agency in October 1987, and Karen joined part-time in 1996 and full-time in 2012. Dean expresses his thanks and to personal and professional friends, Kelly Riddle and Brandon Perron. They first ‘met’ as original and close-knit contributing writers to the original PI Magazine, and continued as contributors with each new publish, multiple books and articles, training seminars and speaking engagements.