Associates in Forensic Investigations - Death Experts
Contact us:
  • Home
  • Dismissed Homicide
  • Life Insurance Win
  • Survivor Benefits Win
  • Ethics
  • Standards

Findings in Expert Consultations of Death

3/3/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture Learn more about the process of death investigation from "Death and Serious Bodily Injury Investigation for the Professional Investigator" - available at www.DeathAndInjuryInvestigationGuide.com
Findings in Expert Consultations of Death

This commentary comes from many conversations we have with families in discussing our process in reviewing the death of their loved one. Most often their concerns are founded - such as being suspicious due to some unusual circumstances in how the body was when found. However, their reasoning for these suspicions are actually a digression from facts and evidence - perhaps the same as some juries have when thinking of the fading CSI effect from the genre of television and movies. Our goal, and passion, is to sort through everything from the official records, reports, and photographs to the questions the family has - and bring both answers and closure, no matter the findings or expectations. The same holds true of all of our legal investigations and expert consultations, not just death - but serious bodily injury, and also in civil, criminal and even probate litigation.


Dean is a founding Advisory Board member of the Force Concepts Training, founded by renowned national expert, and friend, Dennis Root. In developing the Board Certified Force Investigator curriculum, one criteria is all applicant will sign a sworn affidavit attesting to the applicant’s "commitment to conducting impartial, objective, and ethical investigations as an advocate for the facts." For most of us, this is simply common sense; however, it is a powerful statement - and commitment. One we have taken seriously  and unequivocally since our agency's founding. How strong is this commitment within our professional investigators circle of close friends? Brandon Perron, National Director of CDITC (Criminal Defense Investigation Training Council), on which Dean also serves on the Advisory Board - and Brandon is also a fellow founding Advisory Board member of Force Concepts Training, instills the importance of our profession, with "We recognize our fundamental mission as criminal defense and due process investigators is the defense of the United States Constitution with an emphasis upon the 6th Amendment." Within our agency, we have a strong Code of Ethics with the preamble being "As Professional Investigators and Expert Consultants we are dedicated to search for factual information through acceptable investigative procedures. It is our purpose to deal honestly, justly and courteously with all whom we come in contact and to practice their profession according to this Code of Ethics."

These concepts, simple and natural to professional investigators, are important. It is also important for our clients - and colleagues - to understand there are four basic outcomes to both legal investigations and expert consultations: 1) the official investigation was competent, with the official findings consistent with the facts and evidence; 2) the official investigation was not competent, with the official findings consistent with the facts and evidence; 3) the official investigation was competent, with the official findings not consistent with the facts and evidence; and 4) the official investigation was not competent, with the official findings not consistent with the facts and evidence.

Generally, we most often find 2 and 3 being the most common outcomes. This is not to state or imply there is any malice - intentional wrongdoing - on the part of any persons. Mistakes happen, experience happens, and having the ability to look after the fact and with all of the empirical evidence and circumstances before us, and because of the cases we receive - those with great concerns, their may be some questions of competent investigations and findings. Keeping in mind, those cases we do not receive, see or learn about are those in which the facts, evidence, and findings came together as one - and those outcome are by far what happens. However, let's focus on the concerns of family, defendants, and attorneys - those are in which they have founded concerns, enough so to contact our agency or yours. Keep in mind, as professional investigators - our investigations have the very same possible outcomes; simply exchange 'official investigation' for 'legal investigation' or 'expert consultation'.

1) The official investigation was competent, with the official findings consistent with the facts and evidence
This really needs no explanation - all the pieces fell into place, and fit to form a clear picture of the event.

2) The official investigation was not competent, with the official findings consistent with the facts and evidence
The most common area of questioned competence here is the investigation did not follow a protocol, or was not complete - perhaps both. Too often, in any investigation, the investigator or team find evidence that supports a theory, or reaches a plausible conclusion, which ultimately lacks verification. This is not to state or imply the investigator was lucky. Variables from skill and experience, to the evidence, did mesh together sufficiently for the appropriate findings.

3) The official investigation was competent, with the official findings not consistent with the facts and evidence
Similar to #2, and seemingly the opposite - this is the next most common area, but of questioned outcome. These false or unverified findings are most often the result of not analyzing or interpreting the evidence correctly (see #4), whether by cognitive bias or experience. Two persons or teams may conduct the same investigation, review the same facts and evidence, and reach different conclusions. This is what is often seen the courtroom, with opposing investigators and experts; even witnesses who see the same event differently, through no fault of their own.

4) The official investigation was not competent, with the official findings not consistent with the facts and evidence
This is the worst of the worst, and rarest of findings. From the course of the investigation, to the findings - there is issues from beginning to end. Evidence may not have been found, collected, or tested - or any combination. Evidence includes, not only trace evidence - but scene response and investigation; witness development, contact, and interviews; evidence development, collection, and testing. This is not to say the full and entire investigation was not competently conducted; however, it is to show that any component of the investigation not competently conducted and the conclusions, therefore, were unreliable and without factual basis.

How do investigators best reach a conclusion that is both competent and supported by the facts and evidence? By following a protocol to best of one's abilities and resources. We understand all investigations are limited based on available time, resources, funds, and evidence. Any limitation to these - and there always will be - will have an impact on the outcome. Other variables include the investigator's own experience and "commitment to conducting impartial, objective, and ethical investigations as an advocate for the facts."


Picture
We often hear from families, attorneys, investigators and funeral homes representing families, looking for where to turn in understanding how the death of a loved one was (or should have been) investigated.  They seek closure through answers. 

This “Survivors' Guide to Understanding Death Investigations” is a basic introduction, for the lay person, into the concepts of the official investigation of death, such as by a coroner or medical examiner office. It is our hope that understanding these concepts will help the process of healing and closure.

This guide is based upon extensive combined legal and death investigation experience.  Specific to death investigation, this included responding to scenes and completing thorough independent investigations, and assisting with the autopsy.  In addition, the most dreaded and responsible component of the process included the determination, location and notification of the decedent's next-of-kin.

Available at www.UnderstandingDeathInvestigations.com


0 Comments
    We post News of Our Profession, Conferences & Training, Case Studies
    and other related content daily on our agency social media – follow us:

    www.linkedin.com/company/4n6associates

    www.twitter.com/4n6Associates

    Search Blog Archives
    by keyword(s):

    Picture
    Picture

    Archives

    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    December 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    July 2015
    June 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011

(c) 2022 Associates in Forensic Investigations LLC ~ Expert Medicolegal Consultants & Legal Investigators
A Rocky Mountain West Agency - National Consultations (888) 281-6912 ~:~ Associates@DeathCaseReview.com

The information found on this website is for general information purposes only. Any information found on this website does not constitute advice or a solicitation of clients, nor does it create a relationship between the reader and Associates in Forensic Investigations, LLC or its principals.