Associates in Forensic Investigations - Death Experts
Contact us:
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Dismissed Homicide
  • Life Insurance Win
  • Survivor Benefits Win
  • Principals' Bios
  • Sample Cases

Frontline Real CSI - Fact or Fiction

4/21/2012

0 Comments

 
Picture
We have received a lot of emails, and seen several others on listserves, about this show and our opinion.  Its a mixed opinion - there was less discussion of 'Real CSI' and more criticism that was somewhat misplaced and misleading.  This same series did the same in reviewing the death investigation system nationwide - concentrating on a few negative things (and some skewed more negative) and less on the reality.  Being an expert consultant, I was interested and decided to watch.  If you are interested, here is a link to watch online:  http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/real-csi/

The show referenced a recent study and report '2009 Forensic Sciences Report' - which I reviewed and wrote about for The Legal Investigator (official publication of the National Association of Legal Investigators) "Just Because Its Forensics" at http://www.bluetoad.com/publication/?i=60952 Winter 2011 issue (I reviewed the 2009 report a few months before that).  Colleague and fellow NALIan Kathleen Cunningham wrote "Attacking Forensics:  This is Real Life, Not CSI" at http://www.bluetoad.com/publication/?i=102512 Winter 2012 issue.  Kathleen is a Medical Investigator and Medical Legal Nurse Consultant; she worked for the renowned Gerry Spence - I'm sure he hires only the best for his clients, that is why they hired him.  She reviewed the concept of CSI and experts - and provides detailed information and a list of resources to search and research experts.

Education is non-stop, training is non-stop, experience is non-stop.  Within our agency, Karen and I have written extensively on death investigation protocols and importance of understanding the art and science of investigation and forensics.  First, to define 'forensics' is the application of any particular subject to the judicial system.  It is not necessarily science - Karen and I are investigators, not scientists or medical doctors.  We use science and medicine to enhance the art of investigation.  Forensics, like investigation and related skills, is art and science.

First, there is the realization by the FBI that they have learned that science is not 100% correct or infallible.  After several instances of being proven wrong, they no longer allow their personnel to testify as being 'with a 100% certainty' or 'infallible'.  Regardless of that testimony or opinion stated in another forum, it is simply not possible to assert such a claim.  The science may be infallible or 100% correct within the confines of the study, testing and available conclusions of that time.  In the future that may not be.  When there is human involvement, individual minds using individual education, training and experience, and biases - there is going to be a chance for human or other error.  Often the defense team cannot challenge such findings, it is time and cost prohibitive.  Prosecution does have almost unlimited resources -- they can send fingerprints, DNA and other physical evidence to the FBI or state labs for analysis, at no charge.  The defense cannot, and they have no private equivalent without the necessary funds.  I have worked many cases that had this problem.

It is often belief of science over art.  If a theory is proven scientifically, it is believed to be 100% valid.  However, the human factor is the art -- and problems arise when improperly trained, biased, or not independently -- art in the judicial system is interpreted just as art hanging on the wall..  That is essentially the difference - the concept may be science, the human factor is art.

This show discussed the necessity and, by some judges, a recommendation of having one professional organization certify experts.  That may be a few judges, but I know many that would disagree - as does case law.  There are associations specific to specialties and Scientific Working Groups (SWGs) of those working these specialties for improvement - it is in their collective best interests.  As an analogy, insurance companies use screeners to give approval or denial to treatment and fees -- do you want something similar for experts?

When an expert is declared, there is a jury instruction that is given (though maybe not heard or heeded) that goes something like this (from Commonwealth v. Montecalvo):
When a case involves a technical issue, a person with special training or experience in that technical field is permitted to give his or her opinion about that technical issue, in order to help you as the jury.
Merely because a witness has expressed an opinion, however, does not mean that you must accept that opinion. In the same way as with any other witness, it is up to you to decide whether to rely on it. You may accept it or reject it, and give it as much weight as you think it deserves. In making your assessment, you may consider the witness’s education and experience, the reasons given for the opinion, and all the other evidence in the case.

The voire dire leading to the admission of the expert can be arduous, and may be longer than the actual expert's testimony.  At testimony there are issues of medical certainty, scientific certainty, reasonable, reliable, probable, consistent -- all based on education, training and experience.  There is no scientific certainty to experience, that is the art.  Both defense and prosecution, or plaintiff and defense, have available to them experts that follow the same standards and certifications.  Again, if it is not time or cost prohibitive.  In one indigent case we were involved in, the defendant was denied new DNA testing for his criminal trial because the judge delayed a decision on cost (he could not deny the testing) until it was too late to have the tests done, and the amount he authorized was less than half of the discounted fees the lab and consultant offered.

Finally, it cannot be ignored the role of media.  Media created this show and for what intended purpose?  It was biased -- it provided no information or cases in which the same art and science were proven, either in guilt or innocence.  It did not validate or dispel CSI, it really did not discuss CSI (CSI being crime scene investigation).  It did concentrate on crime labs, personnel and processes.

In the end, we tend to believe what works in our favor and disbelieve what does not.  If a fingerprint proves innocence, it is science or if it proves guilt, it is art and vice-versa.  It is important to research the process and facilities, know the protocols and consult with independent subject matter experts.  As Judge Edwards stated in the closing of this Frontline show - "It is not pro prosecution or pro defense, it is pro justice."
-----------
Dean A. Beers, CLI, CCDI is a Certified Legal Investigator and Certified Criminal Defense Investigator.  He is a published author and has lectured extensively and authored multiple articles, peer-reviewed white papers, including Practical Methods for Legal Investigations: Concepts and Protocols in Civil and Criminal Cases, released by CRC Press in February 2011, and previously Professional Investigations:  Individual Locates, Backgrounds and Assets & Liabilities.

Mr. Beers a member and Forensic Investigations Advisor of the Criminal Defense Investigation Training Council.

He began his investigative career in 1987 and operates Associates in Forensic Investigations LLC, with his wife, Karen, also a CCDI.  They have two daughters, a granddaughter and identical twin grandsons.

"We speak for the deceased.  To them we owe the truth."  AFI-LLC intro video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgsvtbSk8fg

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    We post News of Our Profession, Conferences & Training, Case Studies
    and other related content daily on our agency social media – follow us:

    www.linkedin.com/company/4n6associates

    www.twitter.com/4n6Associates

    Search Blog Archives
    by keyword(s):

    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

    Archives

    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    December 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    July 2015
    June 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011

(c) 2025 Associates in Forensic Investigations LLC ~ Expert Medicolegal Consultants & Legal Investigators
A Rocky Mountain West Agency - National Consultations (888) 281-6912 ~:~ [email protected]

The information found on this website is for general information purposes only. Any information found on this website does not constitute advice or a solicitation of clients, nor does it create a relationship between the reader and Associates in Forensic Investigations, LLC or its principals.